StudlyCaps wrote:My point is that although we know they are almost certainly wrong, they are inherently not falsifiable. At least, they are not falsifiable within the belief systems of the believers themselves. I can't prove to a Christian that Jesus isn't coming any more than I can prove to a flat earther that the world is round. They are equally sure that they are right as I am that they are wrong.
I see what you mean. Yes, if someone refuses scientific facts, those cannot be helped. I know many people think they have the right to believe in whatever they want. Sadly that's wrong and nature won't show mercy for the fools. And God forgive me for saying this, but I think they deserve the
Darwin award.
StudlyCaps wrote:My second point is that most of us have beliefs that run counter to mainstream consensus. You have posted on this very forum beliefs you have that most people consider "crackpot", I have my own beliefs that run counter to mainstream ideas.
Now I see what was the misunderstanding. I very rarely post beliefs, and when I do so, I always add "IMHO" or something similar. Most of the time I post things that can be proven.
StudlyCaps wrote:neither of us are going to be dissuaded simply because most people think we are wrong. When it comes to beliefs that cannot be objectively evaluated, "false" is not a useful word to use.
Yeah, but there are certain things that can be objectively evaluated, for example that the sacred water contains virus the same way as any other water.
Anyway, this conversation went further than I originally wanted. All I wanted to say is, don't let yourself be fooled, use your gray thing in your head, and always question everything. Scientific method is the only way to survive on the long run.
Cheers,
bzt