OSDev.org

Here it is. It is not my project, I just found it recently on the internet. The name seems to be derived from russian "петух", which means "chicken".

It's a pointer-based UTM. Interesting variation on the idea, though.

Roman wrote:Here it is. It is not my project, I just found it recently on the internet. The name seems to be derived from russian "петух", which means "chicken".

Петух is male, so in English it should be either rooster or coq [changed to French because the stupid forum software turned it into a bunch of stars, "thinking" the word is used to refer to male genitalia].

Reminds me of Brainfuck ...

But good idea, it made me (and ThePC007) laugh

no92 wrote:Reminds me of Brainfuck ...

Ah, Brainfuck. There's nothing more pointer based, not even assembly .

If some supposed machine started at some predefined address, and used some memory addresses for registers, you can use program it with Brainfuck! You would output some byte by writing it to a memory address, then changing some bit in another memory address. This way, and taking in account that Brainfuck is Turing-complete, it's theorically possible to create a complete OS in Brainfuck

P.D: I have a Brainfuck example in my signature.

KemyLand wrote:This way, and taking in account that Brainfuck is Turing-complete, it's theorically possible to create a complete OS in Brainfuck .

With a little bit of IO, like change ,. to port in/port out rather than stdin/stdout.