Page 1 of 1

Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:32 pm
by sentientnz
After upgrading from Firefox 8.0 to Firefox 9.0.1 (Windows 7), the left navigation pane of the wiki is now broken - it now appears below the main content on the left hand side still.

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:50 am
by Love4Boobies
That's a workaround, not a solution. It's probably time for chase to do a MediaWiki update...

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:11 am
by xenos

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:18 pm
by Jezze
Confirmed. Same problem when browsing the wiki with my Android smartphone.

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:17 pm
by chase
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special: ... Wiki/53348

I've commented out the is_khtml var. Works for me in FF 9.0.1 now. Let me know if anyone has additional problems with this.

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:50 pm
by quok
Love4Boobies wrote:That's a workaround, not a solution. It's probably time for chase to do a MediaWiki update...
With Firefox now being the piece of crap that it is, I think switching to something sane like Chrome isn't just a workaround, it's a solution. :D

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:00 am
by JackScott
quok wrote:With Firefox now being the piece of crap that it is, I think switching to something sane like Chrome isn't just a workaround, it's a solution. :D
Troooollllll! Troollllllllll in the dungeons!

You should know as well as anybody, quok, that choice of browser is just like a choice in OS or text editor (very personal).

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:35 am
by Love4Boobies
To be fair, I don't like Chrome because it has a history of displaying many web pages wrong. I don't know whether the issues have been fixed and if so to what extent because I haven't used it in a very long time but here are a couple of websites I remember having problems with:

http://www.t13.org/ --- The most recent version of Chrome I used* didn't display the menu properly; older one rendered the page unreadable.
http://tftpd32.jounin.net/ --- Unreadable even in the most recent version of Chrome that I tried*.

* This was some months ago.

EDIT: Tested with 9.01 and it works for me too. Thanks.

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:56 am
by shikhin
Hi,

[quote="Love4Boobies"I remember having problems with:

http://www.t13.org/ --- The most recent version of Chrome I used* didn't display the menu properly; older one rendered the page unreadable.
http://tftpd32.jounin.net/ --- Unreadable even in the most recent version of Chrome that I tried*.[/quote]

Both seem perfectly fine to me, on the latest version of Chrome.

Regards,
Shikhin

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:43 am
by Love4Boobies
Ok, so I gave the latest version a shot...

First impression: It wouldn't start without me having manually interfere.
Splash screen
Splash screen
splash.png (9.2 KiB) Viewed 9005 times
Second impression: The T13 website worked. The TFTPD website was not rendered correctly. I also uploaded a screenshot of what Firefox renders but in lower-quality JPEG becase of the forum's file size limit---the difference in size is caused by the fact that the Chrome version has a lot of contiguous green due to the content being placed in an area below my capture. The menu on the left is also messed up.
Chrome
Chrome
Firefox
Firefox
This is reflected by countless websites I just tried (I can provide a list if you still don't believe me but I think I've made my case). Anyway, you may be happy with it but it's the last time I ever give Chrome a shot.

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:08 pm
by Rusky

Re: Firefox 9.0.1 incompatibility

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:37 pm
by Love4Boobies
I realize that the site is buggy but that doesn't really mean anything. As a user, I'm obviously going to pick the browser that gives me the best experience regardless of how web pages are written. It's just like having an OS that runs applications in kernel mode and constantly crashes because of them, but blaming the programs. What do I care who's fault it is?