My Confession and Apology.

Questions, comments, and suggestions about this site should go here.
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

My Confession and Apology.

Post by piranha »

:oops: is basically the premise of this post.
You guys I'm really really sorry about this whole thing, and I have been allowed to make one final statement before the mods vote on me.
I created 2 other accounts on these forums, one named Jenny, the other named da_man.
At first, the Jenny account was kinda real, as she is into OSdev and is helping my with my OS. However, she didn't want to deal with an account here, and asked me to make her presence know to the OSdev community. I did so, but not with my account (I made one for her). The only access to this account was from my computer, for the one post that 'she' made. The post did contain her words.
My personality contains a 'pranking' side. I realized I hadn't ever pulled an April fools here, and I did so by creating the other (da_man) account and created a PM to the Jenny account that was kinda sexual harassment. It was a stupid and pointless (and late, it's April 30th) thing, and I was feeling pretty bad about the whole thing all day, and I debated announcing it. I had a feeling that it would be found out.
I realize that this was extremely poor taste, completly pointless and stupid. I feel terrible.
I don't want to make excuses, as what I did was inexcusable. I will say that I am very sorry and it will never happen again.
OSdev is my hobby. It is the thing that I spend most of my awake time doing (while not in school), and this is the best, largest forum of OSdev out there. Please don't ban me, I'd really like to continue being part of this community.
I've been a member here since late 2006, about 1.5 years, and I love being part of this. I spend a lot of time looking at these forums, having fun looking through all the topics. I really care about staying here, and I am really really sorry about this entire thing.
I haven't been a guy who has offended people a lot. I've tried to help out others in these forums.

I do expect to get yelled at, I already feel terrible but I deserve it.
Mods/Admins, I'm sorry for wasting your time.
Chase, thank you for letting me post this.
I am really really sorry. Please don't ban me.

-JL :oops:
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
User avatar
JackScott
Member
Member
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:03 am
Location: Hobart, Australia
Contact:

Post by JackScott »

:?

Did you hurt anybody? No, except your own sanity.

For whatever it was that you did, you've been remorseful and pretty much indicated you're not going to be repeating it. You haven't annoyed anybody. I personally can't see any ban coming out of that.

But maybe a visit to a psychiatrist wouldn't be out of the question?
User avatar
01000101
Member
Member
Posts: 1599
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:47 pm
Contact:

Post by 01000101 »

most april fools jokes are supposed to be funny.
I guess I don't get why you did this in the first place, it seems kind of pointless and with the only result being bandom.
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

Post by piranha »

Yayyak wrote:You haven't annoyed anybody.
Chase had to dig through the database to un-ban me so I could post this.
I wasted the mods time, and I feel bad about that too.

Looking back, I don't know why I did it either.
It was pointless, and I'm apologizing and confessing, really hoping that the mods can vote to not ban me.

-JL
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

WTH? :lol: You:
  • Created account for your friend 'Jenny'.
  • Posted, and, based on the info in you post, controlled said account.
  • Created yet another account.
  • Sent a prank PM to 'Jenny's account, which you apparently controlled.
So, if I understood you correctly, you prank PM'd yourself?

I think I shall tell you a piece of wise advice that an old high school teacher told me many times: "Don't drink the bong water".

EDIT: Wait, you got banned for creating 2 extra accounts? Did I miss something? Are the mods here really that severe?

EDIT2: My head just exploded from trying to understand this thread. I'm done here....
Last edited by Alboin on Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

Post by piranha »

The Jenny account posted a message on the forums about the prank PM.
But yes, it was through me.
Yayyak: Thank you.
Edit: Yes, I was banned. But I did do a bad thing.

-JL
Last edited by piranha on Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
User avatar
chase
Site Admin
Posts: 710
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Libera.chat IRC: chase_osdev
Location: Texas
Discord: chase/matt.heimer
Contact:

Post by chase »

Alboin wrote: EDIT: Wait, you got banned for creating 2 extra accounts? Did I miss something? Are the mods here really that severe?
Yes (you missed something). The public thread by Jenny complaining about the message. It was moved to a mod area so we could discuss what to do about the sender.

The mods wanted the da_man account banned for the PM. Since the account was obviously created just to send the inappropriate PM there was really no reason not to ban it. When I went looking in the DB for was the best thing to ban(ip,subnet range,email, etc) I found the connection between the three accounts. I decide to ban all the accounts without asking the other mods until I got some explanation. I IM'ed piranha and we agreed that a public confession was in order. The other mods haven't had a chance to voice their opinions yet.
Last edited by chase on Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

chase wrote:
Alboin wrote: EDIT: Wait, you got banned for creating 2 extra accounts? Did I miss something? Are the mods here really that severe?
The mods wanted the da_man account banned for the PM. Since the account was obviously created just to send the inappropriate PM there was really no reason not to ban it. When I went looking in the DB for was the best thing to ban(ip,subnet range,email, etc) I found the connection between the three account. I decide to ban all the accounts without asking the other mods until I got some explanation. I IM'ed piranha and we agreed that a public confession was in order. The other mods haven't had a chance to voice their opinions yet.
Ah, okay. That makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for clearing that up.
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
User avatar
Zacariaz
Member
Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:36 pm
Contact:

Post by Zacariaz »

How serious this "incident" is, is not for me to decide, but it is not the end of the world, that much I know, and as long as you know that you did something wrong, understand why it was wrong and don't do it again, I really don't see a problem.

We all make stupid mistakes from time to time (especially me), but as long as we learn from them it is not that bad and is certainly something we all can get over.

It's not like drunk driving or anything...
This was supposed to be a cool signature...
User avatar
inflater
Member
Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:32 am
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Post by inflater »

I totally agree with Zacariaz. We're all people and not robots. I make fun of people too, teachers, mates,... If it's not over-extented, it's totally alright. For example, in school we were secretly playing with 230 volts attached to some resistors, to see who would stand the (low) current and how long. ;) It didn't injured anybody.

It's just normal, your conscience will strick after the pranks. You'll make a confession in your inside, for those religious, with a priest. That's normal, everybody is making errors. Even me.
My web site: http://inflater.wz.cz (Slovak)
Derrick operating system: http://derrick.xf.cz (Slovak and English :P)
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

Post by piranha »

Thanks guys.
Yeah, I didn't feel to good about it at all.

-JL
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
User avatar
os64dev
Member
Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: Best, Netherlands

Post by os64dev »

@inflater
For example, in school we were secretly playing with 230 volts attached to some resistors, to see who would stand the (low) current and how long. Wink It didn't injured anybody.
There is one major different thing between what you describe here and what piranha did. You and the other voltage seekers did it voluntary and if the issue from piranha were real then it is involuntary. Not to mention the major difference between pranks and sexual harassment, if you have trouble seeing the gap between the two i suggest you volunteer to work at a rape center. This may sound harsh but in my opinion sexual harassment constitutes a rape of the victims mind as it influences every decision after the harassment.

@Zacariaz
It's not like drunk driving or anything...
The problem with drunk driving is, if nobody gets hurt there is no problem wright. So in theory you can sometime do no harm, you only increase the chance of doing harm. With sexual harassment you always do damage. So it is in the eye of the beholder to see the most severe of the two. With regard to drunk driving: don't get me wrong i think everybody who drives with any amount of alcohol should be fined and put to jail but i think that sexual offenders should be punished more severe.

The fact that piranha does a full confession here and pleads to stay on board does show remorse and improves his chances but it should be unwise to skip over the severity of the issue that easily.

but again that is my opinion...
Author of COBOS
User avatar
Alboin
Member
Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Noricum and Pannonia

Post by Alboin »

What kind of sexual harassment are you talking about that it constitutes the 'rape of the mind'? Surely not the playful office 'sexual' harassment' you hear about so often...
sexual offenders should be punished more severe.
Sure, but sexual cases are tricky. Often, it seems that the courts believe women over men, so it ends up being she said "he raped me", and a man, innocent or not, is sent to jail, and his life ruined. Making that more severe doesn't seem right for the people who didn't do anything to begin with.
C8H10N4O2 | #446691 | Trust the nodes.
User avatar
JamesM
Member
Member
Posts: 2935
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 5:27 am
Location: York, United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by JamesM »

Alboin wrote:What kind of sexual harassment are you talking about that it constitutes the 'rape of the mind'? Surely not the playful office 'sexual' harassment' you hear about so often...
sexual offenders should be punished more severe.
Sure, but sexual cases are tricky. Often, it seems that the courts believe women over men, so it ends up being she said "he raped me", and a man, innocent or not, is sent to jail, and his life ruined. Making that more severe doesn't seem right for the people who didn't do anything to begin with.
Digressing this conversation slightly (and I apologise for that), that same argument could be applied to cases or murder, child abuse, pimping, etc etc.

Surely the sentence imposed on a person found guilty of $CRIME should be applied on the pure assumption that the person is guilty - how he/she is found guilty is, and should be, an entirely different system.

As soon as you create more lenient sentences for crimes because the perpetrator may not have actually done them, then you undermine the process of finding that person guilty. Instead of reducing sentences for everyone, guilty or not, one should focus on fixing the system that wrongly judged him in the first place, surely?
User avatar
piranha
Member
Member
Posts: 1391
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Unknown. Momentum is pretty certain, however.
Contact:

Post by piranha »

@os64dev: Are you calling me a sex offender/harasser? Because I don't think that this falls into that category.

To put it like Alboin did: I prank PM'ed myself.

-JL
SeaOS: Adding VT-x, networking, and ARM support
dbittman on IRC, @danielbittman on twitter
https://dbittman.github.io
Locked