If only I had gotten a serious response.berkus wrote: Sorry folks, mod can probably clean this up.
OGL 3.0 without a supporting card
Re: OGL 3.0 without a supporting card
Re: OGL 3.0 without a supporting card
Erm... berkus? Darwin is right, that was his first post to the thread. OP was GhostXoPCorp...
Every good solution is obvious once you've found it.