Page 2 of 2
Re: Favorite Assembler
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:27 am
by XanClic
bitshifter wrote:4) Very easy to port to any operating system (only 2 files to mod)
If you have a minimal libc, you don't even have to modify any file.
XenOS wrote:The second reason is indeed AT&T syntax, which I use for GCC inline assembly anyway, so I don't have to mess with different syntax types.
I don't, because all my makefiles contain "CFLAGS = [...] -masm=intel"
Re: Favorite Assembler
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:08 am
by Brendan
Hi,
NASM here too, for a very long time (although I did switch to YASM for a little while, before NASM supported 64-bit).
Cheers,
Brendan
Re: Favorite Assembler
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:26 am
by Kevin
Only a dead assembler is a good assembler.
No, seriously, for that two and a half lines of assembly I don't really care that much. Any assembler that is available will do the job (which means a slight preference for gas, because basically everyone uses binutils anyway).
Re: Favorite Assembler
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:23 pm
by KotuxGuy
I use NASM. The first assembler I encountered, and the one I still use today.