Page 8 of 13

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2002 12:29 pm
by Joey
man if df were here, this thread would be long gone. ::) :-X

btw: the bases are as follows to me:
first: kissing (making out)
second: SEEING up top
third: SEEING down bottom
home: its time

i dont know what feeling or oral would be considered for. feeling is probably with second. i dont know. but i dont think we should all be talking about this. however, i am not in charge, so i cant say that.

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:05 pm
by smartguy240
For me it is

1st...geting a girl
2nd holding hands....
3rd...kissing...
home...ummm breaking up? ;D

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 10:32 am
by rwfromxenon
smartguy240 wrote: 1st...geting a girl
2nd holding hands....
3rd...kissing...
home...ummm breaking up? ;D
I'm not even on the team yet! :D ;) :) :-\ :( :'(

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 1:44 pm
by Joey
lol. me niether. someday i will. ;D

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:29 pm
by smartguy240
Heh I beleve that is why we are all hrer :- D

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 1:40 pm
by Joey
SPAM!!! GOTYA SMG!!! ;D

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 7:25 pm
by smartguy240
EH?i quoted something new...it wasnt spam...notice that noone has said that.... I meant it to be like

"Heh I beleve that is why we are all hrer :- D "

ok....now decode this...

[font=WIngdings]NOW GET OFF MY FRICKIN BACK JOEY IT IS GETTING ANNOYING!! OH SMG240 IS SPAMMING...IT IS TRULY NOT TRUE AND ISNT A BIG DEAL TO BE MAKING A COMMOTION ABOUT...GEEZ!!!!![/font]


what you think...?

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 2:18 am
by jelleghys
Maybe something like this:


NOW GET OFF MY FRICKIN BACK JOEY IT IS GETTING ANNOYING!! OH SMG240 IS SPAMMING...IT IS TRULY NOT TRUE AND ISNT A BIG DEAL TO BE MAKING A COMMOTION ABOUT...GEEZ!!!!!

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 2:48 am
by jelleghys
First of all: I mostly agree with Rich.

Second: I don't think that "meaningful love is dying a slow, excruciating death". Meaningful love (as you call it) has never been around this much. In all history, people rarely married because they loved eachother. The married because they (or at least the man) had advantages by doing it. There were political advantages, financial, everything you can think of, but seldom people married because of love! Sex is a need (I'm talking about adults here, Joey ;) ). OK, some people don't need it, some people just won't have sex, because of some weird reason (I saw a woman on TV once, who had never had sex, just because she didn't want to, she was 50 years old, and there were no religonal reasons). Animals need sex, and after all, what are we? We're not better than any animal,... not at all.

Chapter three: Who to have sex with.
Rule number one: Don't have sex with anyone if you're seeing someone else. I'm gonna tell you a very personal story: I had a girl once who was VERY jalous. She had been running through my mind for more than a year and then we were together, so I did everything for her. I had never loved anyone so much before. But then again, I was not allowed to just talk with other girls. I did talk with other girls, but afterwards she always had to say something about it. At the end of our relationship, she was the one that kissed (and who-knows-what-else) someone else. She really broke my heart.
But I think that if you're not seeing someone, why can't you just have sex with everyone who wants too? If you haven't had sex lately one you're quite horny, I don't think it's wrong to have a one-night-stand... If he/she's aware of what you're up to.

Chapter Four: The impossible timeless love
I saw an interview with some scienceman and he said that in a biology way love (without thinking of someone else) could only last for four years. Let me explain it a little bit better: You can be together with someone forever, BUT after a four years maximum, you can't live on without thinking of someone else (he means without thinking you're having sex with someone else). I don't think he's completely right, but I think he has some point there. And what's wrong with having fantasies? (OK I know, if your partner is having them, it's just not nice)

One last thing: Why get people divorsed?
Just because they can. 100 years ago, people were just not allowed to divorse. Until dead comes between them you know. But this last century so many things have changed (at least in the western world). Women got (more) rights. People marry because they love eachother, so when they don't love each other anymore, they just get divorsed. Just because it's not that hard anymore to divorse. Another important thing: when a woman marries a man, and he has a job, he brings money. When they divorse the man still has to pay her (don't know for the USA, it's that way here in Belgium). I think that's quite important.
I still love everyone that I have ever loved. The love does change, though, based on time and experience.
I glad to here that I'm not the only one. I even love the girl who broke my heart. I did not talk to her for a year (when she called me, I let the phone ringing... when I saw her at some party, I turned my back on her). But know another year later, I can talk to her again, and I like it, although I don't want to be together with here anymore...


So far for my opinion.

- Jelle

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:57 am
by juncmodule
One note Jelle, divorce was actually practiced by the Vikings. If a woman (and in many cases it was the woman) wanted a divorce she simply went before the Allthing and requested one. They judged her case and would either grant or refuse her request. This happened a lot because the men would often go off viking about and kind of forget to come home. So, the woman was abandoned, and wanted to move on.

It is the 60's that gave rise to the "modern-divorce". You have all of these kids and this huge new culture screaming "let's make love!" But, a decade earlier, the 50's, the atomic household. Women got married at a very young age, often just because they were told that they were supposed to. Along come the 60's, and these married women want to go have fun too. So, divorced rates skyrocket. The reasons have changed, but, those are, from a sociological point of view, the reasons that divorce exists as it does today.

later,
-junc

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 12:00 pm
by smartguy240
Just asking...there are no girls here right?...

Some girl said this to me the other day on AIM...
Keri: dont go stay
Keri: i have fun talkin to you
Keri: But i heard you have a big D*ck
Keri: will you be muh babi?
I said no

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 1:44 pm
by Joey
jeeze sorry jelle. :-[

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 2:03 pm
by smartguy240
Are you resopnding to Jelle's long resopnse....? or to mine...do you have SMG240 syndrome ;)

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 4:14 pm
by Joey
Maybe something like this:


NOW GET OFF MY FRICKIN BACK JOEY IT IS GETTING ANNOYING!! OH SMG240 IS SPAMMING...IT IS TRULY NOT TRUE AND ISNT A BIG DEAL TO BE MAKING A COMMOTION ABOUT...GEEZ!!!!!
thats what. plus he sent me something i didnt appreciate via email. well, usually i would, but she wasnt hot. ;D

Re:... abuse of ...

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2002 4:16 pm
by smartguy240
HA! Not hot...

You know that that was me that said that wich you quoted dont you?