Will A.I. Take Over The World!

[Solar]

[...] I had 7 years studies in Biology (of which 4 years advanced course) [...] I said every part [of the brain] holds the full information [...]

[turdus]

@Combuster: "Did you know you just claimed there are no relations in a fractal?" No, I didn't. What makes you think that?

Because I have had logic and philosophy courses

It has nothing to do with your misunderstanding. I said something according to representation and storage (vertical relation if you like), and you are arguing relation in representation (horizontal relation). No wonder you didn't quote my next sentence, which clarify that.

[turdus]

[...] I had 7 years studies in Biology (of which 4 years advanced course) [...] I said every part [of the brain] holds the full information [...]

It's not my fault you do not follow research on brain. Some of the linked papers are 10 years old...
http://conferences.irmacs.sfu.ca/jonfest2011/talk/79
http://www.itk.ppke.hu/doktori_iskola/v ... thesis.pdf
http://www.dhushara.com/book/paps/chaos/bchaos1.htm
http://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1675/1/paper_297.pdf
...etc.

Or, if you prefer non-scholar description:
http://www.iawwai.com/FractalBrains.html

Edit:
I've found one of the first paper on fractal brain, written by Karl Pribram more than 20 years ago.

When patients suffer damage to their forebrains they do not lose particular memory traces. They may not be able to speak or to identify objects visually or tactily. They may even lose the ability to recall a whole mnemic category (Warrington, 1983), but individual specific memories seem t o be sufficiently distributed so that they may be recalled despite extensive damage.

http://karlhpribram.net/wp-content/uplo ... T-166a.pdf

See also Karl Lashley's experiment.

the location of the removed cortex had no effect on the rats' performance in the maze.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Lashley

Cheers.

[Solar]

Sorry. I indeed missed the fact that they introduced "fractal" as a terminus technicus for this.