Magnets + Computers = ?

All off topic discussions go here. Everything from the funny thing your cat did to your favorite tv shows. Non-programming computer questions are ok too.
User avatar
quanganht
Member
Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 7:13 pm
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by quanganht »

Call the Mythbusters :twisted:
"Programmers are tools for converting caffeine into code."
Gaidheal
Member
Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by Gaidheal »

Almost worth it, if only to see Adam do something stupid with a super-magnet. :¬)
bluepumpkin
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:47 am

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by bluepumpkin »

One time I wasn't thinking and put a speaker magnet on top of a Mac Mini...
To my surprise, it didn't cause any data loss :D
User avatar
Solar
Member
Member
Posts: 7615
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:01 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by Solar »

The basic idea behind the "no magnets" thing is "better safe than sorry".

Ever since the (effectively unshielded) floppy disk is no longer widely used, I believe it is safe to say that all computer hardware is shielded well enough against casual / negligient magnet proximity. Hard drives, for example, require a quite strong magnetic field quite close to their surface to be affected. (Remember, the strength of an magnetic field degrades exponentially with distance.)

One thing, though:

ROM IC's, SSD disks etc. are not inherently "safe" from magnetic fields, even if they don't use magnetism themselves. A magnet (or an EMP pulse...) could induce enough current in an IC to fry the chip. But again, we're talking serious field strengths here.

All in all, it doesn't really matter what the exact physics behind this are. You don't keep magnets near your computer hardware, just as you don't put your tea cup on top of your laptop. Of course you can do it (and I have done both in the past...), but Murphy is an a**hole. :twisted:
Every good solution is obvious once you've found it.
User avatar
NickJohnson
Member
Member
Posts: 1249
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:11 pm
Location: Sunnyvale, California

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by NickJohnson »

Solar wrote:(Remember, the strength of an magnetic field degrades exponentially with distance.)
Isn't it a quadratic (or at least polynomial) decay with distance, not an exponential one? The two are pretty different.
gerryg400
Member
Member
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:26 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by gerryg400 »

It's been a while but I think the magnetic field strength of a theoretical point magnet would drop of with the inverse square of the distance. But the magnetic field of a real actual dipole magnet drops off proportionally with the inverse cube of the distance.
If a trainstation is where trains stop, what is a workstation ?
User avatar
Neolander
Member
Member
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:01 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by Neolander »

Coty wrote:A few years from now I expect all computers to not be effected by Magnets
I hope for you that MRAMs will prove to be a dead-end, then :)

(Some sad news if it happens, that would have been a great way to make use of all these years of research in spintronics)
User avatar
bluemoon
Member
Member
Posts: 1761
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:41 am
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Magnets + Computers = ?

Post by bluemoon »

How about Magnets + Human (ie. the computer user)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromag ... and_safety

Some myth say expose the powerful magnetic fields can lead to cancers.
Post Reply