It must be pretty cool to have your OS developed up to a point you can actually develop apps for it.Tommy wrote:I started writing full applications, including a small calculator.
JAL
It must be pretty cool to have your OS developed up to a point you can actually develop apps for it.Tommy wrote:I started writing full applications, including a small calculator.
Cool, its looking very niceTommy wrote:And another screenshot of Hydrogen OS:
I started writing full applications, including a small calculator.
I like this because you only have to load it in to memory once and then the inbeded apps run off of RAM like puppy linux, witch less loading and less wear and tear on the diskHydrogen OS is an "embedded OS", so many applications will be integrated to the OS binary,
All OS code is located in the conventional memory, and the maximum size of the OS binary is 512 Kbytes (97 KB for the current version).Coddy wrote: I like this because you only have to load it in to memory once and then the inbeded apps run off of RAM like puppy linux, witch less loading and less wear and tear on the disk
Impressive, especially since you're working less than a year on it. Are you trying to be POSIX compliant?hrniels wrote:I've just put the current version of my OS, "Escape", online, so I thought I post it here so that you can see and comment it
Not really. I don't plan to port user-apps some day, because I want to write them myself. So ATM there is no need for being POSIX-compliant. But perhaps I'll add a compatibility-layer later.jal wrote:Impressive, especially since you're working less than a year on it. Are you trying to be POSIX compliant?
Really nice! Do you have an online repo?hrniels wrote:I've just put the current version of my OS, "Escape", online, so I thought I post it here so that you can see and comment it
You can find a short description, screenshots and downloads here: http://script-solution.de/escape
Thanksandreaorru wrote:Really nice! Do you have an online repo?
Nice colorfade
I was asking since what I can see from the commands and output etc. it looks awfully like Linux/Unix. Not bad per se, but if you're not going to be POSIX compliant, I'd personally opt for something more "original" (though I'm not saying you should, of course).hrniels wrote:Not really. I don't plan to port user-apps some day, because I want to write them myself. So ATM there is no need for being POSIX-compliant. But perhaps I'll add a compatibility-layer later.
Yes, many (but not all) user-apps look like the ones from Linux/Unix. Thats because:jal wrote:I was asking since what I can see from the commands and output etc. it looks awfully like Linux/Unix. Not bad per se, but if you're not going to be POSIX compliant, I'd personally opt for something more "original" (though I'm not saying you should, of course).
True, Unix has about 40 years going for it :).hrniels wrote:However, I'm trying to go my own way (and I think, I've done it with some parts), but it should still make sense and be usable. And thats not easy.
I had colours in DOS! ANSI.SYS FTW!kubeos wrote:This could be mistaken for DOS. Maybe I should add some colors to my shell.